We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
Common Market Law Review
Search content button

Home > All journals > Common Market Law Review > 56(1) >

Struggling with Article 101(3) TFEU: Diverging approaches of the Commission, EU Courts, and five Competition Authorities

Cover image ofCommon Market Law Review

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
Struggling with Article 101(3) TFEU: Diverging approaches of the Commission, EU Courts, and five Competition Authorities


Common Market Law Review
Volume 56, Issue 1 (2019) pp. 121 – 156

https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2019006



Abstract

The decentralized enforcement regime of EU competition law is based on the assumption that the obligation to apply the same Treaty provisions is sufficient to ensure a uniform administration of the law. This paper questions this assumption. Based on a systematic analysis of a large database of cases, it presents empirical evidence indicating that the Commission, EU courts and five national competition authorities have followed very different interpretations of the law when applying Article 101(3)TFEU. The paper uses the debate over the types of benefit that can be examined under Article 101(3) TFEU as an illustrative example of the struggle between the different competition authorities in shaping the future of EU competition policy.


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC