The liberalization
trend that dominated global trade since the 1990s has gradually given way to a
renewed wave of protectionism, with trade remedies becoming increasingly
prominent instruments in international trade. Türkiye is one of the most active
users of anti-dumping measures globally, however, the judicial review of such
measures remains limited in both scope and depth. This article examines the
current legal framework governing the judicial review of anti-dumping measures
in Türkiye and addresses structural and procedural areas that could be enhanced
to strengthen legal scrutiny. The article highlights several institutional and
procedural factors that may constrain the effectiveness of judicial review
including the absence of specialized courts, and broader systemic challenges
such as heavy judicial workload and low number of legal challenges brought by
affected parties. It concludes by proposing a set of institutional and
procedural reforms aimed at strengthening the credibility, transparency, and
legal accountability of Türkiye’s trade remedy regime.