<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>KluwerLawOnline.com - European Company Law</title>
        <link>https://kluwerlawonline.com/Journals/European+Company+Law/671</link>
        <description>Provides a legal information service answering all the questions likely to arise in the day-to-day work of a company lawyer.</description>
        <language>en-gb</language>
        <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:01:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial: Modernization of Dutch Company Law</title>
            <link>https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/European+Company+Law/22.2/EUCL2025010</link>
            <category>European Company Law</category>
            <description>Volume 22 Online ISSN 1572-4999</description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/European+Company+Law/22.2/EUCL2025010</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Article: Unveiling the Influence: The Dynamics of Corporate Group Structures</title>
            <link>https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/European+Company+Law/22.2/EUCL2025011</link>
            <category>European Company Law</category>
            <description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;i&gt;This paper explores
the intricate dynamics of corporate group structures, focusing on the influence
of corporate power and the potential risks and inefficiencies associated with
managerialism. It begins by defining corporate groups, highlighting the varying
definitions across jurisdictions and contexts. The paper then examines the
reasons for the formation of corporate groups, emphasizing benefits such as
asset partitioning and risk management. It also addresses the challenges posed
by corporate groups, including issues of power concentration, agency problems,
and opportunism. The analysis underscores the need for a more coherent legal
framework that aligns with the economic realities of modern corporate
structures. By advocating for an enterprise approach the paper argues for
enhanced regulatory oversight and state intervention justified by the
concession theory of the corporation. This shift aims to ensure a more
equitable distribution of the benefits and burdens of corporate activities,
contributing to a fairer corporate landscape.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Volume 22 Online ISSN 1572-4999</description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/European+Company+Law/22.2/EUCL2025011</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Article: ‘Not Everything that Counts Can Be Counted’: The Flaws of the EU Rules on ESG Information</title>
            <link>https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/European+Company+Law/22.2/EUCL2025012</link>
            <category>European Company Law</category>
            <description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;i&gt;The EU has introduced
various ESG information obligations for large companies and financial
intermediaries, hoping to indirectly promote virtuous behaviour. The
legislation is spread across a multiplicity of regulatory sources and concerns
heterogeneous matters: investor protection and consumer preferences (the SFDR,
Delegated Regulation under MIFID II, Listing Act, and Green Claims Directive),
disclosure obligations (the NFRD and subsequently Corporate Sustainability
Reporting Directive (CSRD)), and company duties (the Taxonomy Regulation and,
more recently, Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)).
However, transparency in ESG policies is much more difficult to achieve than in
financial information, given the descriptive nature of sustainability
information and the lack of standards and well-established operating practices.
Comparing the main provisions of European legislation regulating corporate
sustainability information, whether mandatory or not, this study aims to show
how these provisions are gradually becoming closer to the financial information
regime. Despite this, enforcement is weak, because the latter regime is heavily
dependent on the choices of individual Member States, which are left to define
the system of remedies and sanctions. Perhaps this approach is a compromise,
given the differences between the sustainability policies of various national
governments, but its transnational nature means that this phenomenon will
require a higher level of harmonization.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Volume 22 Online ISSN 1572-4999</description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/European+Company+Law/22.2/EUCL2025012</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Case Note: The Shell CO2 Ruling, Considered Partly Through a Group Company Law Perspective</title>
            <link>https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/European+Company+Law/22.2/EUCL2025013</link>
            <category>European Company Law</category>
            <description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Volume 22 Online ISSN 1572-4999</description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/European+Company+Law/22.2/EUCL2025013</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>