We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
Air and Space Law
Search content button

Home > All journals > Air and Space Law > 45(2) >

The Tale of the Airfreight Cartel Case

Cover image ofAir and Space Law

$15.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$29.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
The Tale of the Airfreight Cartel Case


Air and Space Law
Volume 45, Issue 2 (2020) pp. 201 – 226

https://doi.org/10.54648/aila2020010



Abstract

For over a decade, airlines have been subject to an EU Commission investigation and court proceedings for their involvement in an international airfreight cartel. This article provides an overview of the key elements of the case in the EU including the follow-on civil litigation. 

From December 1999 to February 2006, major international airlines coordinated their pricing behaviour on the airfreight market in relation to fuel and security surcharges and refusing payment of commission on surcharges. 

The alleged cartel was brought to light by Lufthansa under an application for immunity to the European Commission on 7 December 2005. Lufthansa’s immunity application prompted the European Commission to open an investigation into major airlines across the globe in February 2006 which concluded with a Decision on 9 November 2010 imposing fines on eleven airlines. The European Commission Decision’s concluded that the airlines conduct constituted a single complex and continuous infringement prohibited by Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 53 of the European Economic Area Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement Between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport. 

On appeal, the EU General Court annulled the 2010 Decision on 16 December 2015 due to an inconsistency between the grounds and the operative part. The European Commission nonetheless re-adopted the decision on 17 March 2017 with fines on ten airlines (one airline having paid the original fine and not appealed). **This complex litigation was extended to several EU national civil courts and currently there are ongoing private claims for damages against British Airways plc along with other Addressees of the EU Commission’s decision from Emerald Supplied Ltd. in the UK High Court and against KLM, Air France, Martinair et al. in the Amsterdam District Court.


Keywords

Airfreight, Cartel, SCCI (Single and continuous complex infringement), EU Commission, Decision readoption


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC