Professor Clay
Christensen (Harvard Business School) described two ways technology may impact
incumbent industries: sustaining and disrupting. This article surveys recent
critiques of the practice of international arbitration (IA) and assesses
whether, in light of those critiques and of the basic tenets of arbitration,
the growing presence of artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool is more likely
to be the former or the latter. It concludes with assessments of the present
state of AI guidance available and makes recommendations.
Therefore when Tao
is lost, there is goodness
When goodness is
lost, there is kindness
When kindness is lost, there is justice.
When justice is lost, there is ritual.
Now ritual is the husk of faith and loyalty, the beginning of confusion.
Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management