International commercial dispute resolution mechanisms are often lauded for the flexibility that they provide, particularly in comparison to courts and tribunals which are oftentimes constrained by rules and regulations. This article will examine the ways in which arbitration, as well as other non-binding forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) such as mediation, can leverage their flexibility to facilitate the effective, economic, and expeditious resolution of international disputes. This can be achieved via the adoption of certain (often unburdensome) processes at various stages across the lifetime of a dispute, from the exchanges of case, to adducing evidence, and the finalization of an outcome. To contextualize the analysis, this article will also draw comparisons to the relevant options available in Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC).