ECJ Rules on Compatibility of Belgian Participation Exemption Regime with EC Parent-Subsidiary Directive - EC Tax Review View ECJ Rules on Compatibility of Belgian Participation Exemption Regime with EC Parent-Subsidiary Directive by - EC Tax Review ECJ Rules on Compatibility of Belgian Participation Exemption Regime with EC Parent-Subsidiary Directive 18 4

This contribution deals with two judgments the European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently has issued regarding the conformity of the Belgian participation exemption with the EC Parent-Subsidiary Directive. The case Belgian State v. Les Vergers du Vieux Tauves SA of 22 December 2008 clarifies the personal scope of application of the Directive. A usufructuary cannot be deemed to have a holding in the capital since from a civil law perspective it derives its right to receive profit distribution from its sufructuary rights and not from a holding in the capital. In the Belgische Staat v. NV Cobelfret case of 12 February 2009, the ECJ again rules that a Member State cannot apply unilateral conditions not provided for in the Directive. This case concerns the condition under Belgian domestic law according to which a parent company must have a positive taxable basis in order to benefit from the participation exemption.

EC Tax Review