While each writer in the common law asserts that their definition of ?unjust enrichment? is the natural and inevitable one, it is clear that a number of views can rationally be held; and that these different views vary both in the precision used and in the extent to which ?unjust enrichment? is seen as vital tool for structuring the law. The writer describes the five main views currently attracting support, and considers whether any greater unanimity may be expected in the foreseeable future.
European Review of Private Law