Abstract: Now that the dust has settled over the introduction and review of statutory recognition procedures in Britain, perhaps it is time to comment on the overall effectiveness of the legislation from a comparative perspective. This article follows the historical development of union recognition in Britain and the response to it by various governments and special interest groups. The intent underpinning the law is examined followed by a jurisdictional comparison using the key indicators of freedom of association, industrial stability and workplace dialogue. The new British legislation, despite its shortcomings, has been moderately effective in contributing towards the government’s partnership agenda. Although the legislation is not as effective as the Canadian law, it is vastly better than the American system that has failed to develop into an instrument of balanced or fair public policy.
International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations