The article spatially juxtaposes the BEPS Project and the recommendations package handed down thereunder in Pakistan and critically appraises its response at two levels: ideational and practical. It is argued that the ideational lens of sovereignty, efficacy, and legitimacy through which the BEPS phenomenon and its outcomes are being keenly looked at elsewhere has not really spiced Pakistan’s response to the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) proposals or the public policy debate surrounding them. At the practical level, it critically maps the BEPS-specified areas that Pakistan has already chartered and those that remain unchartered. The ideational level strings obliquely steer the debate at the practical level.