La convivencia entre la Jurisdicción Arbitral y la Jurisdicción Ordinaria en cuestiones estatutarias y de crisis societaria. Comentario a la Sentencia de conflicto de competencia del Superior Tribunal de Justicia del Brasil (2018/0051390-6) - Iurgium [previously Spain Arbitration Review] View La convivencia entre la Jurisdicción Arbitral y la Jurisdicción Ordinaria en cuestiones estatutarias y de crisis societaria. Comentario a la Sentencia de conflicto de competencia del Superior Tribunal de Justicia del Brasil (2018/0051390-6) by - Iurgium [previously Spain Arbitration Review] La convivencia entre la Jurisdicción Arbitral y la Jurisdicción Ordinaria en cuestiones estatutarias y de crisis societaria. Comentario a la Sentencia de conflicto de competencia del Superior Tribunal de Justicia del Brasil (2018/0051390-6) 2019 36

In the current economic climate, corporate and bankruptcy disputes are of great importance and must be resolved in the most effective way. Arbitration can be a good mechanism to resolve such disputes. Corporate and bankruptcy disputes are in some countries only resolved by the state courts, but this monopoly is ending. The arbitrability of these disputes is now witnessing new trends, especially in corporate disputes, Brazil and Portugal are a good example. Moreover, if these matters are arbitrable, then questions of which tribunal is competent regarding a specific matter are raised. The award that is under analysis tried to resolve such a conflict, if the matter falls within the agreement, the competent forum is the arbitral tribunal. If the matter does not fall within the scope of the agreement, the competent tribunal is the state court. 

Iurgium [previously Spain Arbitration Review]