This article explores the arbitrator’s impartiality through intersectional lens, drawing insights from procedural law, economics, and psychology. Impartiality is examined across multiple dimensions, including aesthetic, subjective multidirectional, objective, evaluativeevidentiary, and normative perspectives. The subject has sparked extensive debate in both academic and judicial arenas, and this study aims to enrich the discussion by highlighting the arbitrator’s essential duty to consistently and actively strive to uphold and foster impartiality.
Iurgium [previously Spain Arbitration Review]