ICC Hybrid Arbitrations Here to Stay: Singapore Courts’ Treatment of the ICC Rules Revisions in Articles 1(2) and 6(2) - Journal of International Arbitration View ICC Hybrid Arbitrations Here to Stay: Singapore Courts’ Treatment of the ICC Rules Revisions in Articles 1(2) and 6(2) by Anthony Cheah Nicholls,Christopher Bloch - Journal of International Arbitration ICC Hybrid Arbitrations Here to Stay: Singapore Courts’ Treatment of the ICC Rules Revisions in Articles 1(2) and 6(2) Anthony Cheah Nicholls Christopher Bloch 31 3

This article examines the recent case of HKL Group Co. Ltd. v. Rizq International Holdings Pte. Ltd., where the Singapore High Court refused to enforce the ICC's 2012 revisions to Articles 1(2) and 6(2) of its Arbitration Rules. These revisions ban so-called 'hybrid arbitrations' and mandate ICC administration for every arbitration that is conducted under the ICC Rules 2012. Singapore was the first jurisdiction that refused to enforce these provisions in favour of party autonomy in 'hybrid arbitrations'. Other pro-arbitration jurisdictions may follow suit once cases arise challenging this mandate.

Journal of International Arbitration