We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
Journal of International Arbitration
Search content button

Home > All journals > Journal of International Arbitration > 34(2) >

Arbitration in Latvia: A Cautionary Tale?

Cover image ofJournal of International Arbitration

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
Arbitration in Latvia: A Cautionary Tale?


Journal of International Arbitration
Volume 34, Issue 2 (2017) pp. 303 – 331

https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2017016



Abstract

This article endeavours to explore the thorny development of arbitration in Latvia. Having started off on the wrong foot in the 1990s, the arbitration environment in Latvia is still far from being perfect. Contrary to its neighbouring Baltic states, Latvia has continuously ignored the possibility of adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law and currently deals with the adverse consequences of an ill-functioning arbitration system, rather than provides for appealing and efficient arbitration environment. All the more, by introducing disproportionately strict qualification requirements for arbitrators and still not providing a mechanism for challenging arbitral awards, the recently adopted 2015 Law on Arbitration is a severe disregard of fundamental international arbitration principles and standards.


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC