Arbitration
has been the subject of various works on the economics of law, which
occasionally neglect the active role of arbitrators as legal suppliers and
producers of decisions. This article elaborates an economic conception of the
arbitrators’ behaviour, perceived as a rational economic agent, and examines
the consequences on the arbitral decision. The first part of the article
examines the individual objectives of the arbitrator by reference to the
traditional assumptions of an economic analysis of the law. The second part
introduces the arbitrator’s interest in his individual reputation, and examines
certain effects thereof on the arbitral decision. Finally, the third part
considers the relationship between the reputation of the
arbitrator, the publication of awards and the transparency of decisions. The
author concludes that an economic analysis of the law enables one to acknowledge
the co-existence of different styles of arbitration and arbitrators’
personalities. In an a priori paradoxical manner, the personal interest of the
arbitrators may also explain a certain quality of arbitral decisions.