Le contentieux institutionnel : de l’expérience et de l’utilité des institutions d’arbitrage pour les litiges de propriété intellectuelle – l’expérience de la CCI - Revue de l’arbitrage View Le contentieux institutionnel : de l’expérience et de l’utilité des institutions d’arbitrage pour les litiges de propriété intellectuelle – l’expérience de la CCI by - Revue de l’arbitrage Le contentieux institutionnel : de l’expérience et de l’utilité des institutions d’arbitrage pour les litiges de propriété intellectuelle – l’expérience de la CCI 2014 2

Between around 5 and 6 percent of new arbitrations registered each year by the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce concern contracts relating to intellectual property. Intellectual property issues arise in numerous disputes, even if these are not the principal subject matter of the contract. In such arbitrations, issues relating to the effect of the arbitration agreement and its extension to non-contractual claims are frequent, as is the case with those relating to the arbitrability of disputes which are generally decided in favour of arbitrators having jurisdiction with limited inter partes effect. The Rules of Arbitration of the ICC and the practice of the Court, in particular in relation to the nomination of arbitrators, urgent measures and confidentiality, present characteristics which make them particularly suited to the resolution of intellectual property disputes. The ICC’s Centre for Expertise often intervenes in intellectual property disputes. This was notably the case recently with disputes arising out of objections to the registration of new internet domain names, administered under the ICC’s Rules for Expertise. 

Revue de l’arbitrage