We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online

Home > All journals > Common Market Law Review > 53(6) >

The crisis, national economic particularism and EU law: What can we learn from the Hungarian case?

Cover image ofCommon Market Law Review

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
The crisis, national economic particularism and EU law: What can we learn from the Hungarian case?


Common Market Law Review
Volume 53, Issue 6 (2016) pp. 1647 – 1674

https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2016145



Abstract

This article examines the ability of EU law to address radical and sudden changes introduced in the Member States pursuing particularistic economic policies in national markets in the wake of the global financial and economic crisis. It contends that national governments relying on the very real political and legal powers available to them in the domestic governance arena can interfere with market conditions and competitive positions without EU law being able to prevent potentially irreversible changes and restoring national markets. Even though the infringement of EU law will eventually be established in the direct and indirect avenues available, that may come too late for market participants and may not deal with the future operation of the affected markets. As the example of developments in Hungary shows, EU enforcement, especially when its national limb is weak, may be unable to satisfy expectations as to its effectiveness.


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC