Home > All journals > Intertax > 46(5) >
$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *
$49.00 - Article (PDF) *
Thibaut Boulangé, Lionel Van der Noot
Intertax
Volume 46, Issue 5 (2018) pp. 450 – 452
https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2018046
Abstract
On 18 January 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereafter ‘CJEU’) ruled in the Stadion Amsterdam CV case (Stadion Amsterdam CV v. Staatssecretaris van Financiën, Case C-463/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:22 (18 January 2018)) that a single supply comprised of two distinct elements, one principal, the other ancillary, which, if they were supplied separately, would be subject to different VAT rates, must be taxed solely at the VAT rate applicable to that single supply. The rate must be determined according to the principal element, even if the price of each element forming the full price paid by a consumer can be identified.
In previous cases, the CJEU had already provided guidance on the VAT treatment applicable to a single supply comprised of several distinct elements. However, the question referred to the CJEU in the Stadion Amsterdam CV case seems to demonstrate that the concept of composite services and the related VAT treatment(s) remained partially unclear(s).
The purpose of this article is to re-examine the main guidelines regarding the concept of composite services as well as the VAT treatment applicable to such supplies in light of the clarification recently provided by the CJEU.
Extract
Abstract: Recent years have witnessed significant reforms of national family law in respect of same-sex couples. There is a clear trend in Europe towards granting legal recognition to same-sex couples, although there is considerable diversity between the types of legal status being afforded. This article examines some of the spillover effects for European Union law arising from these national legal developments. The cross-border challenges were exemplified during the negotiation of the recently adopted Directive on the Free Movement of EU Citizens. In particular, the definition of the family of an EU citizen proved to be highly divisive. Currently, questions relating to the cross-border recognition of different family statuses fall to national legislation and the principles of private international law. Given the nexus with free movement and the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, there appears a need for the European Union to contribute to a better coordination of same-sex partnership laws.
European Review of Private Law