Home > All journals > Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management > 88(4) >
$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *
$49.00 - Article (PDF) *
Isabel Phillips
Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management
Volume 88, Issue 4 (2022) pp. 675 – 709
https://doi.org/10.54648/amdm2022040
Abstract
This article presents the results of the original research and design conducted on behalf of Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (Ciarb) to create an integrated set of competence frameworks for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), and the individual ADR disciplines of Arbitration, Adjudication and Mediation. It argues that ADR as a field needs to be clearer on the competence it is providing to users, in line with other professions such as law or medicine. The competence frameworks are presented together with a summary of the underlying premises of the work, the work process – including consultation – and some of the expected challenges in operationalizing the frameworks.
Keywords
ADR, Arbitration, Mediation, Adjudication, Competence framework, Third-party neutral, Competence statement, Ciarb membership levels
Extract
This article presents the results of the original research and design conducted on behalf of Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (Ciarb) to create an integrated set of competence frameworks for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), and the individual ADR disciplines of Arbitration, Adjudication and Mediation. It argues that ADR as a field needs to be clearer on the competence it is providing to users, in line with other professions such as law or medicine. The competence frameworks are presented together with a summary of the underlying premises of the work, the work process – including consultation – and some of the expected challenges in operationalizing the frameworks.