We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
Common Market Law Review
Search content button

Home > All journals > Common Market Law Review > 49(1) >

Sanctions against Member States under Article 260 TFEU: Alive, but not kicking?

Cover image ofCommon Market Law Review

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
Sanctions against Member States under Article 260 TFEU: Alive, but not kicking?


Common Market Law Review
Volume 49, Issue 1 (2012) pp. 145 – 175

https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2012005



Abstract

Since the Treaty of Maastricht introduced the possibility of imposing financial penalties on Member States that failed to comply with judgments of the Court, only fourteen rulings have been handed down by the Court under Article 260 TFEU (ex 228 EC). Not all of these cases resulted in sanctions, and the penalties imposed in some judgments were hardly sufficient to deter similar infringements from recurring. However, some improvements can be seen in recent years and the Lisbon Treaty has introduced amendments aimed at bolstering the effectiveness of Article 260 TFEU.  Taking stock of the case law and the Lisbon amendments, this article explores whether Article 260 TFEU has been effectively employed as a tool for enforcing EU law and to what extent the Treaty amendments are likely to make a difference.


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC