We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online

Home > All journals > EC Tax Review > 27(5) >

Allocation of the Burden of Proof Under the Anti-Abuse Rule of the Parent-Subsidiary Directive According to the Most Recent ECJ Case Law

Cover image ofEC Tax Review

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
Allocation of the Burden of Proof Under the Anti-Abuse Rule of the Parent-Subsidiary Directive According to the Most Recent ECJ Case Law


EC Tax Review
Volume 27, Issue 5 (2018) pp. 267 – 279

https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2018029



Abstract

The author examines the judgment rendered by the Court in the Deister Holding and Juhler Holding cases and its implications, with special regard to the allocation of the burden of proof between the tax authorities and the taxpayer. The author aims to investigate whether and to what extent Member States - in light of the most recent ECJ case law - are entitled to enact domestic anti-abuse rules which presume that abuse occurred under the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, as well as under the other directives on the harmonization of company taxation.


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC