We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online

Home > All journals > EC Tax Review > 31(3) >

Forum: Order in Skellefteå Industrihus AB: A Reversal of the INZO, Ghent Coal Terminal and Breitsohl Jurisprudence?

Cover image ofEC Tax Review

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
Forum: Order in Skellefteå Industrihus AB: A Reversal of the INZO, Ghent Coal Terminal and Breitsohl Jurisprudence?


EC Tax Review
Volume 31, Issue 3 (2022) pp. 159 – 162

https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022016



Abstract

The Order issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union on 18 May 2021 in Skellefteå Industrihus AB may have escaped the attention of most VAT scholars and practitioners. In my opinion, however, it is either based on a wrong interpretation of the Court’s case law in the ITH and Stichting Schoonzicht cases, or constitutes nothing less than a reversal of the CJEU landmark INZO and Breitsohl decisions.


Keywords

VAT, right to deduct, principle of neutrality, aborted transactions, change of use, adjustments, immovable property


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC