We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
European Business Law Review
Search content button

Home > All journals > European Business Law Review > 35(3) >

The Brussels Effect and the Extraterritoriality of Delaware Corporate Law

Cover image ofEuropean Business Law Review

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
The Brussels Effect and the Extraterritoriality of Delaware Corporate Law


European Business Law Review
Volume 35, Issue 3/4 (2024) pp. 367 – 382

https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2024023



Abstract

This essay explores possible shareholder claims in the United States that may arise if and when member states of the European Union implement the proposed Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence. As a doctrinal matter, legal compliance obligations for corporations incorporated in Delaware extend beyond the borders of the United States. Under Delaware law, shareholders can bring viable fiduciary suits against directors and officers when corporations violate applicable “positive law.” This jurisprudence, principally aimed at ascertaining whether directors and officers betrayed shareholders by engaging in or facilitating lawbreaking, is not limited to complying with American law. As Delaware corporations expand their operations globally, their compliance obligations necessarily include sources of non-American law, including the laws of European nations. Interestingly, the Directive may require American corporations to comply with international treaties that the political branches of the United States have not incorporated as binding sources of domestic law. While exploring scenarios where shareholder claims may be viable, this essay also highlights several limiting principles that may constrain the Directive from opening the floodgate to shareholder suits in the United States.


Keywords

Corporate Law, Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence, European Commission, ESG, Delaware, Extraterritoriality, Caremark, International Law, Shareholder Suits, Brussels Effect


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC