We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
European Business Law Review
Search content button

Home > All journals > European Business Law Review > 35(5) >

The EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Real Change or More of the Same?

Cover image ofEuropean Business Law Review

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
The EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Real Change or More of the Same?


European Business Law Review
Volume 35, Issue 5 (2024) pp. 603 – 626

https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2024034



Abstract

The implementation of mandatory corporate due diligence has been a growing trend in recent years. Viewed as having the potential to prevent corporate abuse, mandatory due diligence can be presented as the mechanism to substantially improve responsible corporate behaviour in practice. In 2022, the European Commission proposed a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The proposal presents obligations for companies regarding any actual or potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts, as well as liability for violation of such obligations. It aims to streamline due diligence obligations across Member States and create a level playing field. Since then, the Council of the EU and the European Parliament have agreed their negotiating positions. This paper explores the proposed CSDDD, including amendments, and analyses the challenges and prospects for mandatory due diligence. It explores whether the CSDDD could result in a genuine transformation of corporate practices to prevent corporate harms, or whether developments are similar to the incremental changes already seen over the years. It is argued that while the CSDDD could be another step in the right direction, significantly more needs to be done to prioritise rights holders above corporations and demonstrate a real change in responsible business practices.


Keywords

Due Diligence, Mandatory Due Diligence, Human Rights Due Diligence, Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, CSDDD, Global Supply Chains, Corporate Sustainability, Corporate Accountability, Company Law, Access to Justice


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC