Home > All journals > European Business Law Review > 27(6) >
$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *
$49.00 - Article (PDF) *
Geert van Calster
European Business Law Review
Volume 27, Issue 6 (2016) pp. 735 – 753
https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2016034
Abstract
In this contribution I summarily review the changes to the European Insolvency Regulation (‘EIR’). The new Regulation, 2015/848, will apply to insolvency proceedings opened after 26 June 2017. It repeals Regulation 1346/2000. I will use ‘EIR 2015’ for the new Regulation and ‘former EIR’ when I refer to Regulation 1346/2000. In reviewing the changes, I have given readers uninitiated with the Regulation some context to the core provisions and ambitions of the Regulation. However this article is not meant to provide general instruction into the EIR as a whole.
As a prelimina ry note, the Regulation’s official title is a bit of a misnomer. The title of the Regulation is simply ‘Regulation [number] on insolvency proceedings’. However the Regulation does not harmonise substantive insolvency law. It is an instrument of private international law, harmonising jurisdictional rules, applicable law and recognition and enforcement of judgments in insolvency matters.
Extract
Debates on EU external relations among scholars and policy-makers have often lamented the lack of coherence and inability of the EU to 'speak with one voice'. This article, by contrast, focuses on the ability of the EU to use diplomatic capacity to understand the preferences and domestic politics of third countries. This aspect of EU external relations has been somewhat neglected in both academic and policy debates thus far, and the article uses the case of EU engagement with China on climate to illustrate its importance. EU-China engagement on climate change has resulted in a range of bilateral cooperation activities, but has delivered less for the EU in terms of developing a better European understanding of the preferences and domestic politics of climate change in China. The article further discusses how particular institutional challenges have constrained the EU's climate diplomacy, including vertical and horizontal fragmentation and a lack of institutional capacity on the part of the EU.
European Foreign Affairs Review