We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
European Foreign Affairs Review
Search content button

Home > All journals > European Foreign Affairs Review > 24(4) >

Crisis, Coordination and Coherence: European Decision-Making and the 2015 European Neighbourhood Policy Review

Cover image ofEuropean Foreign Affairs Review

$15.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$29.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
Crisis, Coordination and Coherence: European Decision-Making and the 2015 European Neighbourhood Policy Review


European Foreign Affairs Review
Volume 24, Issue 4 (2019) pp. 447 – 468

https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2019037



Abstract

This article discusses the 2015 European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) review and its aftermath, focusing on the impacts of preference formation and coordination among Member State and EU-level actors on the coherence of a complex policy framework. Drawing on hitherto unexplored empirical material, it argues that a perception of crisis among key decision-makers evolved into a consensus that turmoil in the neighbourhood posed serious threats to Europe. This facilitated a coordination effort among EU Member States to reach common positions on a narrow set of policy priorities, especially security, counter terrorism and border control. Member State unity and direction from the European External Action Service limited the European Commission’s autonomy and facilitated the prioritization of security-related cooperation in the neighbourhood. The outcome of this process was a more focussed and therefore more coherent policy framework, but also one with dramatically reduced ambition. Support for liberal-democratic political and economic transformation in the EU’s image was stripped away, leaving a securitized policy framework aimed at increasing ‘resilience’ to perceived threats from the neighbourhood.


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Contribute to this journal

Go Directly to PeerEase! Submit Article

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC