In Case C-461/18 P Changmao v. Distillerie Bonollo and Others, the Court of Justice of the EU clarified the conditions under which the EU industry and EU producers can challenge a regulation imposing anti-dumping duties, where they consider that those duties are set too low. Contrary to the analysis proposed by the Advocate General, the Court of Justice does not recognize a ‘right to an imposition of an anti-dumping duty’. Rather, it bases direct concern on the specific role the Union industry plays in the administrative procedure. The Court also clarifies the effects of annulment: Where the EU Courts annul a regulation terminating an interim review, the effect of annulment is that the duty as originally imposed applies. Finally, the Court also adopts a very narrow interpretation of the notion of ‘change in circumstances’ pursuant to Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation.