We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
International Journal of Comparative Lab...
Search content button

Home > All journals > International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations > 36(4) >

Constituting a Right to Association: A Postcolonial Exploration

Cover image ofInternational Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations

$15.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$29.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
Constituting a Right to Association: A Postcolonial Exploration


International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations
Volume 36, Issue 4 (2020) pp. 523 – 552

https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2020026



Abstract

In this article, I emphasize the social realm, rather than legislative action or judicial enumeration, as the preferred site for understanding the constitution of the legal right to association. I argue that the substance of a right – what we understand when we claim a right – emerges through contextual socio-historical processes before it penetrates the imagination of either the legislature or the judiciary. This emphasis on the social realm in understanding the contour of a right is particularly important for postcolonial societies such as India, where a Western universalist rights language is constitutionally adopted to unify a country that comprises heterogeneous socio-cultural milieux. Partha Chatterjee articulates this disjuncture by offering a distinction between the formal (constitutional) civil society and the informal political society. Drawing on Chatterjee’s distinction and interpreting historical ideas and their continued relevance on the nature of industrial relations, I show how the judiciary failed to take note of, and the legislature only belatedly reacted to, the validity of worker cooperatives as a legal right to association even when it received broad social recognition.


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Contribute to this journal

Go Directly to PeerEase! Submit Article

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC