Home > All journals > Journal of International Arbitration > 32(5) >
$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *
$49.00 - Article (PDF) *
Seung Chong, Chin Leng Lim
Journal of International Arbitration
Volume 32, Issue 5 (2015) pp. 461 – 492
https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2015022
Abstract
The Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China has issued a Draft Foreign Investment Law that proposes to cause the convergence of the PRC’s foreign and domestic investment regimes. That convergence in its current form will result in existing rights of foreign investors being extinguished or compromised. We discuss the loss of such rights in the light of the types of investors’ remedies that are currently provided for under China’s Bilateral Investment Treaties. In doing so, we show how the issues raised by the newly proposed investment regime can be framed as claims under the various standards of PRC treaty protection and the particular complexities that arise for consideration. This article is an assessment of the propensity and prospect of future arbitration claims concerning a complex draft law that, whether legislated in its current or in an amended form, will have significant commercial and economic implications. This matter is probably the single most important issue today in China corporate practice and we believe it has a strong investment law and arbitration dimension that demands to be explored and explained.
Extract
RESUMEN: El presente artículo examina las cláusulas modificatorias de responsabilidad en materia de construcción, en especial, aquellas que la limitan, restringen y exoneran, a partir de los modelos de contratos FIDIC del año 2017; junto con ello, se revisa la validez y alcances de dichas cláusulas y cómo han sido recogidas en la práctica del Common Law, del Civil Law y por los principios de Unidroit; y, finalmente, se analizan dos laudos arbitrales internacionales destacados que han estimado que concurren los presupuestos fácticos para declarar inaplicables las limitaciones de responsabilidad pactadas por las partes.
ABSTRACT: The present article examines the clauses modifying liability in construction matters, particularly those that limit, restrict, and exempt liability, based on the FIDIC contract models of 2017. Along with this, the validity and scope of these clauses are reviewed, as well as how they have been adopted in the practices of Common Law, Civil Law, and by the Unidroit principles. Finally, the article analyzes two notable international arbitration awards that have found the factual grounds to declare the agreed-upon limitations of liability inapplicable.
Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem