We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online

Home > All journals > European Company Law > 22(2) >

Article: ‘Not Everything that Counts Can Be Counted’: The Flaws of the EU Rules on ESG Information

Cover image ofEuropean Company Law
Article: ‘Not Everything that Counts Can Be Counted’: The Flaws of the EU Rules on ESG Information


European Company Law
Volume 22, Issue 2 (2025) pp. 39 – 48



Abstract

The EU has introduced various ESG information obligations for large companies and financial intermediaries, hoping to indirectly promote virtuous behaviour. The legislation is spread across a multiplicity of regulatory sources and concerns heterogeneous matters: investor protection and consumer preferences (the SFDR, Delegated Regulation under MIFID II, Listing Act, and Green Claims Directive), disclosure obligations (the NFRD and subsequently Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)), and company duties (the Taxonomy Regulation and, more recently, Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)). However, transparency in ESG policies is much more difficult to achieve than in financial information, given the descriptive nature of sustainability information and the lack of standards and well-established operating practices. Comparing the main provisions of European legislation regulating corporate sustainability information, whether mandatory or not, this study aims to show how these provisions are gradually becoming closer to the financial information regime. Despite this, enforcement is weak, because the latter regime is heavily dependent on the choices of individual Member States, which are left to define the system of remedies and sanctions. Perhaps this approach is a compromise, given the differences between the sustainability policies of various national governments, but its transnational nature means that this phenomenon will require a higher level of harmonization.


Keywords

Sustainability, ESG, Transparency, Enforcement, SFRD, CSRD, CSDDD, Green claims, Listing Act


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC