Home > All journals > European Review of Private Law > 26(6) >
$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *
$49.00 - Article (PDF) *
Oscar Borgogno
European Review of Private Law
Volume 26, Issue 6 (2018) pp. 885 – 902
https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2018060
Abstract
Abstract: The success of smart contracts based on distributed ledger technology (DLT) springs from their potential to secure contract performance when traditional legal enforcement remedies are not practical or too costly. EU policymakers and regulators have struggled for years to facilitate the enforcement of consumer rights while reducing transaction costs for businesses. The article argues that smart contracts can be a viable tool to address such a challenge. By virtue of their self-executing and tamper-proof character, smart contracts are suited to substantially reduce transaction costs in B2C relationships. So far, several legal scholars have raised concerns regarding both smart contracts inability to reflect relational aspects of contract governance and the augmented complexity generated by the translation of an agreement into computer code. Building upon the extant literature on the topic, the article explains why these problems can be overcome when it comes to consumer rights that are standardized and easily verifiable. Thus, smart contracts will likely prove suitable for specific industries, such as the transport sector. The article concludes that policy makers and regulators shall take the lead by testing, with a sector-specific approach, smart contracts ability to improve the consumer protection toolbox.
Extract
The ever-increasing number of private actors operating in the space industry is giving rise to the concern for adequate domestic legal frameworks to regulate commercial space activities, and the UK is no exception. This article provides a comprehensive review and outline of the UK’s most recently enacted national space law, namely the Space Industry Act 2018. The article identifies and discusses the component elements of the 2018 Act, such as licensing, regulatory requirements, and liability and indemnity implications. Many of these are common to other national space legislation and other national space legislation is therefore considered briefly for comparative purposes. The article critically analyses the 2018 Act from the perspective of whether it aligns with the UK government’s stated aim to foster the development of private space activities from the UK, and whether the correct balance has been struck between ensuring regulatory requirements yet encouraging commercial ventures. The article also seeks to address, as far as possible – given the absence of formal arrangements at the time of writing – some of the issues posed by Brexit in this sector and how the UK is attempting to ‘future proof’ against these.
Air and Space Law