We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
European Review of Private Law
Search content button

Home > All journals > European Review of Private Law > 31(6) >

Make It Stringent: A Plea for an Unfair Terms Regulation

Cover image ofEuropean Review of Private Law

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
Make It Stringent: A Plea for an Unfair Terms Regulation


European Review of Private Law
Volume 31, Issue 6 (2023) pp. 1175 – 1196

https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2023061



Abstract

The Unfair Terms Directive (UTD) is one of the most important pieces of EU private law, yet its understanding and implementation in the Member States is quite diverse. Despite the abundance of preliminary rulings on the Directive, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has not managed to bring uniformity into its interpretation. The main reason is the legislative form chosen, which is that of a directive, allowing Member States very wide discretion in transposing its rules into their national law. This has given rise to sharp differences between Member State laws. The result is uncertainty, legal fragmentation, and an uneven playing field in the Union. 

To remedy this situation, we suggest a recast of the UTD and its transformation into a regulation. This would have several benefits. First, the scope, depth and the effects of unfair terms control would be the same in all Member States. Second, the Court of Justice of the European Union would no longer have to take account of the complex background of the different national laws when responding to references for preliminary rulings; instead, it could directly declare a certain clause as being incompatible with the Regulation and decide on its consequences. Third, the Annex of the Directive could be made binding, which would further enhance legal certainty and the effectiveness of the control. Finally, as the Regulation would fully harmonize the standard of unfair terms control, with the result that clauses compatible with it could be used throughout the Union, without any risk of running afoul of national law. This would give a boost to the integration of the Internal Market.


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC