We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Search content button

Home > All journals > Global Trade and Customs Journal > 11(4) >

TPP and Investor-State Dispute Settlement: An Intertwined Spectrum of Options for Investors?

Cover image ofGlobal Trade and Customs Journal

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
Download the PDF icon

TPP and Investor-State Dispute Settlement: An Intertwined Spectrum of Options for Investors?


Global Trade and Customs Journal
Volume 11, Issue 4 (2016) pp. 157 – 164

https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2016019



Abstract

Once ratified, Chapter 9 of the TPP (the Investment Chapter) will provide important protections to investors through the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) system. While the Investment Chapter has triggered certain criticism, TPP members have relied for years on the ISDS system as an effective mechanism to solve disputes under pre-existing international investment agreements (IIAs). The new ISDS provisions are not revolutionary but reflect an effort by TPP members to regulate and include public concerns in the Investment Chapter.

There is, however, a remarkable absence in the TPP: there is no provision addressing the “coexistence” between TPP and preexisting IIAs. This absence—which very likely will result in investor-State treaty shopping— will offer alternatives to investors to bring arbitration claims under preexisting investment treaties.


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC