Home > All journals > European Business Law Review > 27(5) >
$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *
$49.00 - Article (PDF) *
Giuseppe Settanni
European Business Law Review
Volume 27, Issue 5 (2016) pp. 697 – 708
https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2016031
Abstract
Payments of interest amounts in floating rate loans are generally linked to specific reference parameters, such as EURIBOR. Given the decrease of such parameters to reference values around zero, what would happen if such a fall continued below this value (so that lenders have to pay interest amounts to borrowers)? General principles of interpretation of contracts, good faith and equity, jointly with an analysis of nature / characteristics of loan contracts could help to find a solution being the most transnational possible. In particular, reference could be made to: (i) an interpretation of the loan contract by which such contract cannot betray its nature (and interest payments are necessary in non-gratuitous loans); (ii) the equity principle, under which contracts have to be reasonable / fair (and lenders should receive back by borrowers at least the capital amount); (iii) the nature of loans as contracts necessarily requiring interest payments by borrowers.
Extract
In a surprising opinion handed down in November 2023, Advocate General Pitruzzella agreed with the European Commission that Apple was given unlawful State aid by Ireland. The Advocate General recommended that the European Court of Justice uphold the Commission’s two central grounds of appeal. This note will look at each in turn, highlighting how the Advocate General fails to properly apply previous case law, to sense the general mood around the application of the state aid rules to tax administration, and to account for the (overinclusive) consequences of his approach. As a result, it is highly unlikely that the European Court of Justice will agree with the Advocate General.