Home > All journals > Intertax > 47(5) >
$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *
$49.00 - Article (PDF) *
Lucas de Lima Carvalho
Intertax
Volume 47, Issue 5 (2019) pp. 425 – 443
https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2019044
Abstract
This article challenges an assertion made by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in the Final Report of Action 1 of the BEPS Action Plan, as well as in subsequent reports and policy notes. While the OECD claims in those documents that the digital economy only ‘exacerbates’ BEPS issues, we argue that the digital economy may also create unique BEPS issues related to Autonomous Artificial Intelligence (AAI) (specifically, the unique issues of ‘disappearing income’ and ‘powerlessness to tax’). AAI is defined as an Artificially Intelligent system that (1) is capable of performing tasks commonly associated with human intelligence and beyond, (2) is not directly or indirectly controlled by human beings, and (3) has full managerial power over its own actions and resources, which may be contained, but not controlled by human beings or by entities (legal or otherwise) representing the interests of human beings. The article provides policy recommendations to address the BEPS issues related to AAI, as well as comments on their impacts for tax administration, for enforceability and for the broader structure of domestic and international tax law.
Extract
The court is showing a tendency towards exposing secondary EU law to a less intensive review under primary EU law than it does for national law. With a potentially large wave of direct tax law harmonization ahead, this has been met with alertness in literature as it may not be adequate for the field of taxation. Against this background, this article elaborates on the development of a direct tax relevant doctrine on the enforcement of economic rights enshrined in primary EU law. The core argument worked out by the author can be summarized as follows. Given the weak democratic legitimation of EU direct tax directives, and having regard to the fact that they are extraordinary difficult to adapt or abolish, the court has an increased responsibility to protect taxpayers’ economic rights – particularly when the underlying legislative decision or value is not worth being upheld at the cost of an infringement of such rights.
Intertax