We use cookies on this site to provide you with an informative and engaging experience and also to help us to continually improve our site for you. Without allowing cookies certain features of the site will not be available. To learn more about how we use cookies, please view our cookie policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy.

Logo of Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law Online
Journal of World Trade
Search content button

Home > All journals > Journal of World Trade > 57(3) >

Did Labour Norms Save the NAFTA?: Sort of, Accidentally, Depends

Cover image ofJournal of World Trade

$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *

$49.00 - Article (PDF) *

*service fee may apply
Did Labour Norms Save the NAFTA?: Sort of, Accidentally, Depends


Journal of World Trade
Volume 57, Issue 3 (2023) pp. 505 – 530

https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2023017



Abstract

The evolution of labour and environmental norms in the global trading system has been full of fits and starts but were formally linked together in side-agreements to the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The NAFTA’s evolution complicates reading of literatures devoted to the evolution of norms. This paper traces and compares the uneven trajectory of labour and environmental norms in North America through the renegotiation of the NAFTA 2017– 2019. The paper takes issue with norms scholarship as cast against the NAFTA. Whereas norms scholarship generally posits a liberalizing, progressive trajectory for norm evolution, focused mainly on their mobilization by non-state actors, that literature has hitherto been less able to account for more traditional accounts of norms being weaponized for illiberal, protectionist purposes now embodied in the renegotiated NAFTA.


Keywords

NAFTA, USMCA, Labour, Environment, Norms, Enforcement, US Trade Policy and Politics


Extract




Subscribe to this journal

Interested in a subscription? Contact our sales team

Browse by practice area
Share
Stay up to date


RSSETOC