Home > All journals > Global Trade and Customs Journal > 13(10) >
$25.00 - Rental (PDF) *
$49.00 - Article (PDF) *
Gustavo Adolfo Guarin Duque
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Volume 13, Issue 10 (2018) pp. 420 – 434
https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2018046
Abstract
This article is a research written under the legal framework of the World Trade Organization. It focuses on the compatibility of the Trump administration’s tariffs, quotas and waivers on imported steel and aluminium with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade of 1994 and the Agreement on Safeguards.
In the research, the author made a general description of the measures enacted by the US on aluminium and steel and made a legal assessment of the measures in the light of the principal obligations provided in the GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Safeguards of the WTO.
Extract
The GATT regulates state trading enterprises by imposing the commercial considerations requirement, which has been incorporated with some modifications into the chapters on state-owned enterprises ( State Owned Enterprises) of free trade agreements (FTAs) and economic partnership agreement (EPAs). This requirement has significance as an underlying principle disciplining State Owned Enterprises even against recent issues, such as distortions in competition due to competitive advantages or overcapacity and oversupply backed by privileges not normally available to private companies. Indeed, State Owned Enterprises discipline should differ depending on whether they pursue certain policy objectives as governments do or fiscal revenue as private companies do, and the regulatory approach to recent problems varies accordingly. The commercial considerations requirement prohibits mixing these objectives, thereby dictating the discipline to which each State Owned Enterprise is subject. In this light, the commercial considerations requirement in the GATT is narrow in scope, and invites the challenging question of whether to cover State Owned Enterprises performing governmental functions and, if so, how to devise effective and acceptable institutional guarantees to ensure compliance. The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and Japan-EU EPA (JEEPA) appear to attempt to address these issues; however, their effectiveness is open to question, as certain State Owned Enterprises are neither subject to the commercial considerations requirement nor regulated as entities pursuing policy objectives under these agreements.